",{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Person","@id":"https://amit.marketing/#person","name":"Amit Sharma","url":"https://amit.marketing/","description":"Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.","jobTitle":"Licensed Real Estate Salesperson","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","addressLocality":"Auckland","addressCountry":"NZ"},"knowsAbout":["Auckland property","Residential rents","Real estate marketing","Social media marketing","Indian nutrition","Fitness and training"],"sameAs":["https://www.youtube.com/@AmitSharmanz","https://www.facebook.com/AmitSharmaNZ","https://www.instagram.com/amitsharmaofficial","https://www.tiktok.com/@amitsharmanz"]}]
Part of the data ring
FightIndex
Era profile

1900s boxing

What 1900s boxing fighters actually measure — 37 of them, from Wikipedia's own data.

Across the 37 1900s boxing fighters in this dataset, the median reach advantage is 2.79% — a median reach of 68″ on a median height of 67.5″. 100% fight orthodox.

The era's shape

Median reach

68″

172.7 cm

Median height

67.5″

171.5 cm

Median reach advantage

2.79%

of body height

Median finish rate

59%

of wins inside the distance

Fighters

37

13 with a reach on file

0%1900s boxing reach advantage8.9%

Stance

  • orthodox100%

By country

  • United States25
  • United Kingdom2
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland2
  • Canada2
  • Australia1
  • Ireland1
  • Austria1
  • Barbados1
  • Kingdom of Denmark1
  • Switzerland1

Longest reach for the frame

#FighterReachHeightAdvantage
1Tommy Burns73″67″+8.93%
2Joe Gans71″66″+7.58%
3Young Peter Jackson70″66″+6.09%
4Barbados Joe Walcott65″61.4″+5.83%
5Marvin Hart74″71″+4.27%
6Terry McGovern65″63″+3.19%
7Jack Johnson74″72″+2.79%
8Jimmy Walsh63.5″62″+2.41%
9Harry Forbes65″63.5″+2.36%
10Frank Erne68″66.5″+2.25%
11Pedlar Palmer64″63″+1.62%
12Harry Harris68″67.8″+0.35%
13Bill Lang72.8″72.8″0%

How this is worked out

  1. Every 1900s boxing fighter in the dataset.
  2. Reach advantage is (reach − height) ÷ height as a percentage.
  3. Medians, not means — a single outlier should not move the typical figure.
Reach advantage = (reach − height) ÷ height × 100

Full methodology →

SOURCE·English Wikipedia infoboxes + Wikidata roster·REVIEWED AUG 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.