Naoya Ogawa 小川直也
7–2 · 9 recorded bouts · 1997–2005
Naoya Ogawa 小川直也 finished 100% of 7 wins inside the distance — the 72nd percentile for heavyweight MMA, where the median is 85%. No reach is on record, so this page compares record rather than measurements.
What is on record
| Reach | not recorded | |
|---|---|---|
| Height | 76″ (193 cm) | |
| Stance | — | |
| Division | Heavyweight MMA | |
| Peak era | 1990s | |
| Country | Japan |
Wikipedia carries no reach figure for Naoya Ogawa 小川直也, so the reach-advantage comparison this site is built on cannot be computed. Everything below comes from the record instead.
Record
MMA record
7–2
9 bouts on record
Finish rate
100%
of wins ended inside the distance — heavyweight MMA median 85%, 72nd percentile
The career, bout by bout
9 recorded bouts from 1997 to 2005. Every incumbent shows this as a table you have to read; here it is as a shape you can see.
Career span
9y
1997–2005
Longest unbeaten run
5
without a loss — draws do not break it
Busiest year
2004
3 bouts
Recorded bouts
9
9 with a date
Fights
| Year | Result | Opponent | Method | Rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | L | Hidehiko Yoshida | Submission | 1 |
| 2004 | L | Fedor Emelianenko | Submission | 1 |
| 2004 | W | Paulo Cesar Silva | KO/TKO | 1 |
| 2004 | W | Stefan Leko | Submission | 1 |
| 2002 | W | Matt Ghaffari | KO/TKO | 1 |
| 2000 | W | Masaaki Satake | Submission | 2 |
| 1999 | W | Rob Peters | Submission | — |
| 1999 | W | Gary Goodridge | Submission | 2 |
| 1997 | W | Rens Vrolijk | Submission | 1 |
4 of these opponents have their own page here.
How this is worked out
- Measurements and records are read from the fighter's English Wikipedia infobox; the fight list is parsed from the article's own results table.
- Reach advantage is (reach − height) ÷ height as a percentage, so fighters of different sizes compare directly.
- Percentiles rank this fighter among the 324 heavyweight MMA fighters in the dataset — chosen because it is the most specific group of at least 30 that this fighter belongs to.
Reach advantage = (reach − height) ÷ height × 100
Source: Naoya Ogawa on English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0), as of 2026-07-10. Percentiles and derived figures computed here.