Part of the data ring
FightIndex
2010s MMA · 2010s

Kailin Curran

64″ reach · +1.62% reach advantage · 43rd percentile

Kailin Curran has a reach of 64″ against a height of 63″ — a reach advantage of +1.62%, short for 2010s MMA and the 43rd percentile of the 560 compared here.

Reach in context

Reach advantage

+1.62%

64″ reach on a 63″ frame

Compared against 560 2010s MMA fighters — no weight class is on record for Kailin Curran, so the comparison is by era. Median 2.75%.

-3.2%2010s MMA reach advantage12.9%
Measurements
Reach64″ (162.6 cm)3rd pct
Height63″ (160 cm)3rd pct
Stance
DivisionStrawweight MMA
Peak era2010s
CountryUnited States

Record

MMA record

6–7

13 bouts on record

Finish rate

17%

of wins ended inside the distance — strawweight MMA median 54%, 8th percentile

Submission: 1 (17%)Decision: 5 (83%)
  • Submission 17%
  • Decision 83%

The career, bout by bout

13 recorded bouts from 2013 to 2019. Every incumbent shows this as a table you have to read; here it is as a shape you can see.

win vs Emi Tomimatsu (2013)win vs Kaiyana Rain (2013)loss vs Paige VanZant (2014)win vs Yoo Jin Jung (2014)win vs Emily Kagan (2015)loss vs Alex Chambers (2015)loss vs Jamie Moyle (2016)loss vs Felice Herrig (2016)loss vs Yan Xiaonan (2017)loss vs Aleksandra Albu (2017)loss vs Brianna Van Buren (2019)
winlossdraw / NC2013–2019

Career span

7y

2013–2019

Longest unbeaten run

2

without a loss — draws do not break it

Busiest year

2013

2 bouts

Recorded bouts

13

11 with a date

Fights

YearResultOpponentMethodRd
2019 L Brianna Van Buren Submission2
2017 L Yan Xiaonan Decision3
2017 L Aleksandra Albu Decision3
2016 L Jamie Moyle Decision3
2016 L Felice Herrig Submission1
2015 W Emily Kagan Submission2
2015 L Alex Chambers Submission3
2014 L Paige VanZant KO/TKO3
2014 W Yoo Jin Jung Decision3
2013 W Emi Tomimatsu Decision3
2013 W Kaiyana Rain Decision3
W Sharon Jacobson Decision
W Sunna Davíðsdóttir Decision

8 of these opponents have their own page here.

How this is worked out

  1. Measurements and records are read from the fighter's English Wikipedia infobox; the fight list is parsed from the article's own results table.
  2. Reach advantage is (reach − height) ÷ height as a percentage, so fighters of different sizes compare directly.
  3. Percentiles rank this fighter among the 560 2010s MMA fighters in the dataset — chosen because it is the most specific group of at least 30 that this fighter belongs to.
Reach advantage = (reach − height) ÷ height × 100

Full methodology →

Source: Kailin Curran on English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0), as of 2025-09-27. Percentiles and derived figures computed here.

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.