Part of the data ring
FightIndex
2000s MMA · 2000s

Emily Kagan

66″ reach · +4.75% reach advantage · 83rd percentile

Emily Kagan has a reach of 66″ against a height of 63″ — a reach advantage of +4.75%, long for 2000s MMA and the 83rd percentile of the 239 compared here.

Reach in context

Reach advantage

+4.75%

66″ reach on a 63″ frame

Compared against 239 2000s MMA fighters — no weight class is on record for Emily Kagan, so the comparison is by era. Median 2.79%.

-3.2%2000s MMA reach advantage6.1%
Measurements
Reach66″ (167.6 cm)5th pct
Height63″ (160 cm)1st pct
Stance
DivisionStrawweight MMA
Peak era2000s
CountryUnited States

Record

MMA record

3–3

6 bouts on record

Finish rate

0%

of wins ended inside the distance — strawweight MMA median 54%, 0th percentile

Decision: 3 (100%)
  • Decision 100%

The career, bout by bout

6 recorded bouts from 2012 to 2015. Every incumbent shows this as a table you have to read; here it is as a shape you can see.

win vs Glena Avila (2012)win vs Lynae Lovato (2012)win vs Ashley Cummins (2013)loss vs Rose Namajunas (2013)loss vs Angela Hill (2014)loss vs Kailin Curran (2015)
winlossdraw / NC2012–2015

Career span

4y

2012–2015

Longest unbeaten run

3

without a loss — draws do not break it

Busiest year

2012

2 bouts

Recorded bouts

6

6 with a date

Fights

YearResultOpponentMethodRd
2015 L Kailin Curran Submission2
2014 L Angela Hill Decision3
2013 W Ashley Cummins Decision3
2013 L Rose Namajunas Submission3
2012 W Glena Avila Decision3
2012 W Lynae Lovato Decision3

4 of these opponents have their own page here.

How this is worked out

  1. Measurements and records are read from the fighter's English Wikipedia infobox; the fight list is parsed from the article's own results table.
  2. Reach advantage is (reach − height) ÷ height as a percentage, so fighters of different sizes compare directly.
  3. Percentiles rank this fighter among the 239 2000s MMA fighters in the dataset — chosen because it is the most specific group of at least 30 that this fighter belongs to.
Reach advantage = (reach − height) ÷ height × 100

Full methodology →

Source: Emily Kagan on English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0), as of 2026-03-29. Percentiles and derived figures computed here.

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.