Part of the data ring
FightIndex
2010s boxing · 2010s

Winyu Paradorn Gym

6–3 · 10 recorded bouts · 2006–2009

Winyu Paradorn Gym finished 17% of 6 wins inside the distance — the 5th percentile for 2010s boxing, where the median is 60%. No reach is on record, so this page compares record rather than measurements.

What is on record

Measurements
Reachnot recorded
Height65″ (165.1 cm)
StanceOrthodox
DivisionMini Flyweight Boxing
competed at 2: atomweight, mini flyweight — compared here against the last
Peak era2010s
CountryThailand

Wikipedia carries no reach figure for Winyu Paradorn Gym, so the reach-advantage comparison this site is built on cannot be computed. Everything below comes from the record instead.

loss vs Siriporn Thaweesuk (2006)win vs Wannee Chaisena (2006)draw vs Tukta Pakabbuth (2007)win vs Momo Koseki (2007)win vs Panda Or Yutthachai (2007)win vs Napaporn Boonchuon (2007)loss vs Momo Koseki (2008)win vs Paetonglek Jindamanee (2008)win vs Tukta Pakabbuth (2008)loss vs Teeraporn Pannimit (2009)
winlossdraw / NC2006–2009

Record

Boxing record

6–3

10 bouts on record

Finish rate

17%

of wins ended inside the distance — 2010s boxing median 60%, 5th percentile

By knockout: 1 (17%)By decision: 5 (83%)
  • By knockout 17%
  • By decision 83%

The career, bout by bout

10 recorded bouts from 2006 to 2009. Every incumbent shows this as a table you have to read; here it is as a shape you can see.

Career span

4y

2006–2009

Longest unbeaten run

4

without a loss — draws do not break it

Busiest year

2007

4 bouts

Recorded bouts

10

10 with a date

Fights

YearResultOpponentMethodRd
2009 L Teeraporn Pannimit Decision6
2008 L Momo Koseki 2
2008 W Paetonglek Jindamanee Decision6
2008 W Tukta Pakabbuth 6
2007 D Tukta Pakabbuth Draw8
2007 W Momo Koseki Decision10
2007 W Panda Or Yutthachai 5
2007 W Napaporn Boonchuon 8
2006 L Siriporn Thaweesuk Decision6
2006 W Wannee Chaisena 4

3 of these opponents have their own page here.

How this is worked out

  1. Measurements and records are read from the fighter's English Wikipedia infobox; the fight list is parsed from the article's own results table.
  2. Reach advantage is (reach − height) ÷ height as a percentage, so fighters of different sizes compare directly.
  3. Percentiles rank this fighter among the 862 2010s boxing fighters in the dataset — chosen because it is the most specific group of at least 30 that this fighter belongs to.
Reach advantage = (reach − height) ÷ height × 100

Full methodology →

Source: Chirawadee Srisuk on English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0), as of 2026-07-07. Percentiles and derived figures computed here.

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.