Part of the data ring
FightIndex
Bantamweight MMA · 2010s

Bea Malecki

74″ reach · +7.24% reach advantage · 94th percentile

Bea Malecki has a reach of 74″ against a height of 69″ — a reach advantage of +7.24%, exceptional for bantamweight MMA and the 94th percentile of the 101 compared here.

Reach in context

Reach advantage

+7.24%

74″ reach on a 69″ frame

Compared against 101 bantamweight MMA fighters. Median 1.51%.

-2.9%bantamweight MMA reach advantage8.9%
Measurements
Reach74″ (188 cm)97th pct
Height69″ (175.3 cm)85th pct
Stance
DivisionBantamweight MMA
Peak era2010s
CountrySweden

Record

MMA record

4–1

5 bouts on record

Finish rate

75%

of wins ended inside the distance — bantamweight MMA median 68%, 65th percentile

KO/TKO: 1 (25%)Submission: 2 (50%)Decision: 1 (25%)
  • KO/TKO 25%
  • Submission 50%
  • Decision 25%

The career, bout by bout

6 recorded bouts from 2017 to 2021. Every incumbent shows this as a table you have to read; here it is as a shape you can see.

2020 win vs Faith Davis (2017)win vs Helin Paara (2017)win vs Tracy Smith (2018)win vs Duda Santana (2019)win vs Veronica Macedo (2020)loss vs Josiane Nunes (2021)
winlossdraw / NC2017–2021

Career span

5y

2017–2021

Longest unbeaten run

5

without a loss — draws do not break it

Busiest year

2017

2 bouts

Recorded bouts

6

6 with a date

Fights

YearResultOpponentMethodRd
2021 L Josiane Nunes KO/TKO1
2020 W Veronica Macedo Decision3
2019 W Duda Santana Submission2
2018 W Tracy Smith KO/TKO1
2017 W Faith Davis Submission1
2017 W Helin Paara KO/TKO2

How this is worked out

  1. Measurements and records are read from the fighter's English Wikipedia infobox; the fight list is parsed from the article's own results table.
  2. Reach advantage is (reach − height) ÷ height as a percentage, so fighters of different sizes compare directly.
  3. Percentiles rank this fighter among the 101 bantamweight MMA fighters in the dataset — chosen because it is the most specific group of at least 30 that this fighter belongs to.
Reach advantage = (reach − height) ÷ height × 100

Full methodology →

Source: Bea Malecki on English Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0), as of 2025-11-20. Percentiles and derived figures computed here.

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.